United States v. Danes

71 M.J. 304, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 432
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedApril 20, 2012
DocketNo. 12-0229/AR
StatusPublished

This text of 71 M.J. 304 (United States v. Danes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Danes, 71 M.J. 304, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 432 (Ark. 2012).

Opinion

CCA 20091072. Review granted on the following issue:

UNDER THIS COURT’S DECISIONS IN FOSLER AND BALEAN, WAS IT PREJUDICIAL ERROR, IN A PARTIALLY CONTESTED CASE, TO CONVICT APPELLANT OF ARTICLE 134 SPECIFICATIONS THAT FAILED TO ALLEGE THE TERMINAL ELEMENT OF THAT OFFENSE?

No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
71 M.J. 304, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-danes-armfor-2012.