United States v. Dandridge
This text of 469 F. App'x 205 (United States v. Dandridge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Lynwood Gale Dandridge, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 UlS.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Dandridge’s motion to appoint counsel and affirm the court’s order. United States v. Dandridge, No. 4:07-cr-00002-JLK (W.D.Va. Dec. 1, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
469 F. App'x 205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-dandridge-ca4-2012.