United States v. Dames

262 F. App'x 179
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided January 10, 2008·No. No. 06-14786·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant received the mandatory minimum sentence of 36 months’ incarceration prescribed by 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(ii), attempting to bring an alien into the United States for financial gain. He now appeals his sentence, contending that the district court erred in enhancing his offense level on the ground that he committed the offense while on supervised release.

The Guidelines sentence range the court found called for a prison term of 15-21 months. That range was inapplicable, however, because the mandatory minimum sentence the court was required to impose exceeded the sentence range. See U.S.S.G. § 5Gl.l(b) Therefore, even if we were to agree with appellant—that the court erred in enhancing his offense level—the error was harmless.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Dames, 262 F. App'x 179 (11th Cir. 2008).

262 F. App'x 179 (United States v. Dames) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bringing in and harboring certain aliens
8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(ii)