United States v. Dames
This text of 262 F. App'x 179 (United States v. Dames) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant received the mandatory minimum sentence of 36 months’ incarceration prescribed by 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(ii), attempting to bring an alien into the United States for financial gain. He now appeals his sentence, contending that the district court erred in enhancing his offense level on the ground that he committed the offense while on supervised release.
The Guidelines sentence range the court found called for a prison term of 15-21 months. That range was inapplicable, however, because the mandatory minimum sentence the court was required to impose exceeded the sentence range. See U.S.S.G. § 5Gl.l(b) Therefore, even if we were to agree with appellant—that the court erred in enhancing his offense level—the error was harmless.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
262 F. App'x 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-dames-ca11-2008.