United States v. Dallas Leonard Mullins
This text of 430 F.2d 1332 (United States v. Dallas Leonard Mullins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Convicted of refusing to report for civilian work in the national interest in lieu of military service, the appellant assigns numerous errors in the admission of testimony and in the argument of counsel for the Government at his trial. He further contends that the statute authorizing civilian work assignments is unconstitutional in that it fails to allow free rein to his sincere religious belief in the immorality of any cooperation with civil authority.
We find no merit in any of the claims raised. Cf. United States v. Berrigan, 4 Cir., 417 F.2d 1002.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
430 F.2d 1332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-dallas-leonard-mullins-ca4-1970.