United States v. Dais
This text of 135 F. App'x 910 (United States v. Dais) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
In our prior decision, we affirmed Dais’ conviction and the sentence imposed by the district court. United States v. Dais, 101 Fed. Appx. 669, 2004 WL 1326245 (9th Cir.2004) (unpublished disposition). The Supreme Court vacated the disposition and remanded to this court for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Dais v. United States, — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 989, 160 L.Ed.2d 1034 (2005). We remand to the district court for further proceedings in light of United States v. Booker, — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005) and United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir. 2005) (en banc). In all other respects, our prior decision remains in full force and effect.
REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
135 F. App'x 910, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-dais-ca9-2005.