United States v. Dais

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7124

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

NORMAN TYRONE DAIS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Florence, at District of South Carolina. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:03-cr-00386-TLW-1)

Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 6, 2010

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Norman Tyrone Dais, Appellant Pro Se. Rose Mary Sheppard Parham, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Norman Tyrone Dais appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for production of documents for his

inspection. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm. Dais has not given any

substantial reason for granting the request. We also deny his

motion for an expedited appeal. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED