United States v. Dailey

342 U.S. 863, 72 S. Ct. 105, 1951 U.S. LEXIS 1374
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 5, 1951
DocketNo. 162
StatusPublished

This text of 342 U.S. 863 (United States v. Dailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Dailey, 342 U.S. 863, 72 S. Ct. 105, 1951 U.S. LEXIS 1374 (1951).

Opinion

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. It is ordered that Bernard Margolius, Esquire, of Washington, D. C., a member of the bar of this Court, be appointed to serve as counsel for the appellee in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
342 U.S. 863, 72 S. Ct. 105, 1951 U.S. LEXIS 1374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-dailey-scotus-1951.