United States v. Dailey
This text of United States v. Dailey (United States v. Dailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-50900
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ANTHONY DAILEY,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. W-95-CR-35-2 -------------------- April 4, 2000
Before GARWOOD, SMITH, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Anthony Dailey appeals the district court’s denial of the
Government’s Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b) motion. A timely notice of
appeal is a prerequisite to the exercise of jurisdiction by this
court. United States v. Carr, 979 F.2d 51, 55 (5th Cir. 1992).
Dailey’s notice of appeal was filed more than ten days after the
district court denied the motion and is thus untimely. Fed.
R. Crim. P. 4(b). Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction over this
appeal, and it is DISMISSED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Dailey, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-dailey-ca5-2000.