United States v. Daevone Brown
This text of United States v. Daevone Brown (United States v. Daevone Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 18-3105 ___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee
v.
Daevone Rashad Brown
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines ____________
Submitted: September 5, 2019 Filed: September 10, 2019 [Unpublished] ____________
Before LOKEN, COLLOTON, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Daevone Brown appeals after he pled guilty to a felon-in-possession charge, and the district court1 sentenced him to a prison term below the calculated United
1 The Honorable Stephanie M. Rose, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. States Sentencing Guidelines Manual (“Guidelines”) range. His counsel has moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), suggesting the district court erred in applying an enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B), based on Brown’s possession of a firearm in connection with another offense, namely, carrying weapons in violation of Iowa Code § 724.4(1).
We conclude the district court properly applied the enhancement under § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B). See United States v. Turner, 781 F.3d 374, 393 (8th Cir. 2015) (reviewing application of Guidelines de novo, and findings of fact for clear error); United States v. Walker, 771 F.3d 449, 452-53 (8th Cir. 2014) (affirming application of enhancement under § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) to felon in possession of firearm, who possessed firearm in connection with violation of § 724.4(1)). In addition, having independently reviewed the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel leave to withdraw, and we affirm. ______________________________
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Daevone Brown, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-daevone-brown-ca8-2019.