United States v. Cyril T. Hanna
This text of 1 F.3d 1247 (United States v. Cyril T. Hanna) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 F.3d 1247
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Cyril T. HANNA, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 93-10047.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted June 17, 1993.
Decided July 19, 1993.
Before NORRIS and RYMER, Circuit Judges and TAYLOR, District Judge*
MEMORANDUM**
The government appeals the district court's order requiring it to review and produce impeachment materials from the files of the San Francisco police officers who will be testifying at defendant's trial. The threshold issue in this case is whether the district court's order is contrary to our holding in United States v. Dominguez-Villa, 954 F.2d 562 (9th Cir.1992).
Because the record in this case provides no evidentiary basis for distinguishing it from Dominguez-Villa, we vacate the order of the district court and remand for further proceedings.
VACATED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 F.3d 1247, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 26564, 1993 WL 269515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cyril-t-hanna-ca9-1993.