United States v. Cynthia R. Reed

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedApril 24, 1997
Docket96-4152
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Cynthia R. Reed (United States v. Cynthia R. Reed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Cynthia R. Reed, (8th Cir. 1997).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 96-4152 ___________

United States of America, * * Appellee, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Cynthia R. Reed, also known as * District of Nebraska. Chelle Reed, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. * ___________

Submitted: April 16, 1997

Filed: April 24, 1997 ___________

Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and BEAM, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

Cynthia R. Reed pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute and possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine. Arguing that post- traumatic stress brought on by repeated childhood sexual assaults caused her to commit the instant offense, Reed moved for a downward departure from the Guidelines sentencing range under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5K2.13, p.s. (diminished capacity). After an evidentiary hearing, the 1 district court denied Reed’s motion, concluding that the evidence failed to establish that Reed’s post-traumatic stress disorder resulted in a significantly reduced mental capacity which contributed to the

1 The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska. commission of the offense. The court sentenced Reed to 30 months’ imprisonment, the minimum sentence in the applicable Guidelines range. Reed appeals her sentence.

Because our reading of the record satisfies us that the district court was aware of its authority to depart downward under section 5K2.13, the court’s exercise of its discretion not to depart is unreviewable. See United States v. Jackson, 56 F.3d 959, 960-61 (8th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Darrin Jackson
56 F.3d 959 (Eighth Circuit, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Cynthia R. Reed, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cynthia-r-reed-ca8-1997.