United States v. Cynthia Carrasco
This text of United States v. Cynthia Carrasco (United States v. Cynthia Carrasco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 20-10551 Document: 00515635518 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/12/2020
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
FILED November 12, 2020 No. 20-10551 Lyle W. Cayce Conference Calendar Clerk
United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Cynthia Marie Carrasco,
Defendant—Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:19-CR-158-1
Before Jones, Clement, and Haynes, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Cynthia Marie Carrasco has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Carrasco has filed a response. The record is not
* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 20-10551 Document: 00515635518 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/12/2020
No. 20-10551
sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Carrasco’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014); United States v. Corbett, 742 F.2d 173, 176- 78 (5th Cir. 1984). We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Carrasco’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Cynthia Carrasco, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cynthia-carrasco-ca5-2020.