United States v. Curtis

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Curtis

11 F. App'x 129

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 23, 2001·No. 01-6233·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Bertrand Leon Curtis seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A § 2255 (West Supp.2000). Assuming Curtis’ claim is not procedurally defaulted, a matter not addressed by the district court and one we *130 do not decide, we have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Curtis, No. CA-01-127-CCB (D.Md. Jan. 26, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Bertrand Leon Curtis seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A § 2255 (West Supp.2000). Assuming Curtis’ claim is not procedurally defaulted, a matter not addressed by the district court and one we *130 do not decide, we have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Curtis, No. CA-01-127-CCB (D.Md. Jan. 26, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

United States v. Curtis, 11 F. App'x 129 (4th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

11 F. App'x 129 (United States v. Curtis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.