United States v. Curry

610 F. App'x 962
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided July 29, 2015·No. No. 14-15608·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Randolph Murrell and Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Michael Edward Curry, have filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsels’ assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent review of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsels’ motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Curry’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Curry, 610 F. App'x 962 (11th Cir. 2015).

610 F. App'x 962 (United States v. Curry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)