United States v. Curry

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Curry

610 F. App'x 962

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedJuly 29, 2015

DocketNo. 14-15608

StatusPublished

This text of 610 F. App'x 962 (United States v. Curry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Curry, 610 F. App'x 962 (11th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Randolph Murrell and Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Michael Edward Curry, have filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsels’ assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent review of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsels’ motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Curry’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Randolph Murrell and Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Michael Edward Curry, have filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsels’ assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent review of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsels’ motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Curry’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

610 F. App'x 962, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-curry-ca11-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack