United States v. Currie
123 F. App'x 95
This text of 123 F. App'x 95 (United States v. Currie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Currie, 123 F. App'x 95 (3d Cir. 2005).
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Reginald Currie appeals from the sentence imposed following his conviction for bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). We vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing in accordance with the Supreme Court’s recent decision in United States v. Booker, — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).
VACATED and REMANDED for re-sentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Booker
543 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 2004)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
123 F. App'x 95, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-currie-ca3-2005.