United States v. Currence

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Currence

562 F. App'x 165

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 27, 2014·No. No. 13-7766·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kareem Jamal Currence appeals the district court’s order denying his self-styled Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Currence, No. 3:05-cr-00231-JRS-l (E.D.Va. Oct. 11, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kareem Jamal Currence appeals the district court’s order denying his self-styled Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Currence, No. 3:05-cr-00231-JRS-l (E.D.Va. Oct. 11, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Currence, 562 F. App'x 165 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

562 F. App'x 165 (United States v. Currence) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.