United States v. Curley

66 F. 720, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 3327
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedFebruary 7, 1895
DocketNo. 1,876
StatusPublished

This text of 66 F. 720 (United States v. Curley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Curley, 66 F. 720, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 3327 (circtsdny 1895).

Opinion

OOXE, District Judge

(orally). The question in this cause is whether or not the importation, which was assessed by the collector as a cook’s knife, should have been classified as a manufacture of metal under paragraph 215 of the tariff act of 1890. The uncontra-dicted evidence shows that the importation in question is either a cook’s knife, a kitchen knife, or a butcher’s knife. These knives are all provided for in paragraph 167 and each is a more specific designation than a “manufacture of metal.” As the importers only protest upon the ground that the importation is a manufacture of metal, it is manifest that the decision of the board of general appraisers should be reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
66 F. 720, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 3327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-curley-circtsdny-1895.