United States v. Curley
This text of 329 F. App'x 746 (United States v. Curley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Joseph Mosh Curley appeals from the 42-month sentence imposed following revocation of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Curley contends that the district court erred by failing to articulate sufficiently compelling reasons for imposing a sentence substantially above the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines range. This contention lacks merit. See United States v. Leonard, 483 F.3d 635, 637 (9th Cir.2007); see also United States v. Simtob, 485 F.3d 1058, 1062-63 (9th Cir.2007).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
329 F. App'x 746, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-curley-ca9-2009.