United States v. Cunningham
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 10, 2007
Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-20079 c/w No. 05-20367 Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
TONY CUNNINGHAM,
Defendant-Appellant.
-------------------- Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:01-CR-49-1 --------------------
Before DeMOSS, STEWART and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Tony
Cunningham has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief
in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Cunningham has not filed a response. Our independent review of
the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for
appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEALS ARE DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Cunningham (United States v. Cunningham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.