United States v. Cunningham

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Cunningham. Read the opinion of the Court — 117 F. App'x 373
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 10, 2007·No. 05-20079·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT July 10, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-20079 c/w No. 05-20367 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TONY CUNNINGHAM,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:01-CR-49-1 --------------------

Before DeMOSS, STEWART and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Tony

Cunningham has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief

in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Cunningham has not filed a response. Our independent review of

the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for

appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the APPEALS ARE DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Cunningham, (5th Cir. 2007).

United States v. Cunningham (United States v. Cunningham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)