United States v. Cunningham

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Cunningham

296 F. App'x 353

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Cunningham. Read the opinion of the Court — 221 F. App'x 258 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 20, 2008·No. No. 08-7252·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Rashad Cunningham appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to compel the Government to file a Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion to reduce his sentence for substantial assistance. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Cunningham, No. 4:04-cr-00127-HCM-JEB-1 (E.D.Va. Nov. 17, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Rashad Cunningham appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to compel the Government to file a Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion to reduce his sentence for substantial assistance. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Cunningham, No. 4:04-cr-00127-HCM-JEB-1 (E.D.Va. Nov. 17, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Cunningham, 296 F. App'x 353 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

296 F. App'x 353 (United States v. Cunningham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.