United States v. Cummings
70 M.J. 417, 2011 CAAF LEXIS 1022
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedNovember 16, 2011
DocketNo. 12-0096/NA
StatusPublished
This text of 70 M.J. 417 (United States v. Cummings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Cummings, 70 M.J. 417, 2011 CAAF LEXIS 1022 (Ark. 2011).
Opinion
CCA 201000623. On consideration of the motions filed by Lieutenant Michael Hanzel for leave to withdraw as appellate defense counsel, it appears that the Judge Advocate General has assigned other counsel to represent Appellants and the new attorneys have assumed the representation of said Appellants. Accordingly, it is ordered that said motions are hereby granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
70 M.J. 417, 2011 CAAF LEXIS 1022, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cummings-armfor-2011.