United States v. Culver
This text of 20 C.M.A. 217 (United States v. Culver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Opinion of the Court
Issues concerning the failure of the military judge to assure himself that accused’s pretrial request for trial by military judge alone was understandingly made and his failure to advise the accused of his right to retain appointed military counsel if he elected civilian counsel or military counsel of his own choosing, if reasonably available, were the subject of consideration in our recent cases of United States v Jenkins, 20 USCMA 112, 42 CMR 304 (1970), and United States v Turner, 20 USCMA 167, 43 CMR 7 (1970). The findings and sentence in this case, however, must be overturned because the appellant did not submit before or at the inception of trial his request, in writing, to be tried by military judge alone. United States v Dean, 20 USCMA 212, 43 CMR 52 (1970).
Accordingly, the decision of the United States Navy Court of Military Review is reversed. The findings of guilty and sentence are set aside. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy. Another trial may be ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
20 C.M.A. 217, 20 USCMA 217, 43 C.M.R. 57, 1970 CMA LEXIS 664, 1970 WL 7429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-culver-cma-1970.