United States v. Cullen Huckaby

Sixth Circuit

United States v. Cullen Huckaby

419 F.2d 1323

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedMarch 23, 1970

Docket19419, 19443

StatusPublished

This text of 419 F.2d 1323 (United States v. Cullen Huckaby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Cullen Huckaby, 419 F.2d 1323 (6th Cir. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On July 19, 1968, this Court in an unpublished order affirmed ,the conviction of appellant, Huckaby, for the offense of possession of a still, mash and distilled spirits and working in a distillery in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5179 (a), (1), 5205(a) (2), 5222(a) (1), 5601 (a) (1), 5601(a) (7), 5604(a) (1) and 5681(c). Thereafter this Court dismissed a second appeal as frivolous and entirely without merit. United States v. Huckaby, 400 F.2d 576, cert. denied, 393 U.S. 933, 89 S.Ct. 291, 21 L.Ed.2d 269, rehearing denied, 393 U.S. 1046, 89 S.Ct. 617, 21 L.Ed.2d 599.

The two appeals in the present cases, which were consolidated for briefing and oral argument, are from the dismissal by the District Court of a “motion for relief in the nature of a writ of error coram nobis” and a proceeding which was treated by the District Court as a motion to vacate sentence under 28 U.S. C. § 2255. Appellant complains that he was denied relief without an evidentiary hearing. The record discloses that the District Court previously had accorded appellant two evidentiary hearings, first on his original jury trial and a second on his motion for a new trial on grounds of newly discovered evidence.

Upon consideration, .the Court concludes that both of the present appeals are without merit.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On July 19, 1968, this Court in an unpublished order affirmed ,the conviction of appellant, Huckaby, for the offense of possession of a still, mash and distilled spirits and working in a distillery in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5179 (a), (1), 5205(a) (2), 5222(a) (1), 5601 (a) (1), 5601(a) (7), 5604(a) (1) and 5681(c). Thereafter this Court dismissed a second appeal as frivolous and entirely without merit. United States v. Huckaby, 400 F.2d 576, cert. denied, 393 U.S. 933, 89 S.Ct. 291, 21 L.Ed.2d 269, rehearing denied, 393 U.S. 1046, 89 S.Ct. 617, 21 L.Ed.2d 599.

The two appeals in the present cases, which were consolidated for briefing and oral argument, are from the dismissal by the District Court of a “motion for relief in the nature of a writ of error coram nobis” and a proceeding which was treated by the District Court as a motion to vacate sentence under 28 U.S. C. § 2255. Appellant complains that he was denied relief without an evidentiary hearing. The record discloses that the District Court previously had accorded appellant two evidentiary hearings, first on his original jury trial and a second on his motion for a new trial on grounds of newly discovered evidence.

Upon consideration, .the Court concludes that both of the present appeals are without merit.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

419 F.2d 1323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cullen-huckaby-ca6-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack