United States v. Cuevas

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Cuevas. Read the opinion of the Court — 75 F.3d 778
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided September 26, 1994·No. 93-1224·Published

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion


September 26, 1994
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

___________________

No. 93-1224

UNITED STATES,
Appellee,

v.

ABELARDO CUEVAS,
Defendant, Appellant

____________________

ERRATA SHEET

This opinion of this court issued on September 22 1994, is
amended as follows:

On page 2 line 15 please insert the number "1169-70" after
the "comma" and the number "1162,".

September 21, 1994 [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 93-1224

UNITED STATES,

Appellee,

v.

ABELARDO CUEVAS,

Defendant, Appellant.

____________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Robert E. Keeton, U.S. District Judge]
___________________

____________________

Before

Cyr, Circuit Judge,
______________
Bownes, Senior Circuit Judge, and
____________________
Stahl, Circuit Judge.
______________

____________________

James B. Krasnoo on brief for appellant.
________________

____________________

____________________

Per Curiam. Appellant Abelardo Cuevas appeals his
__________

conviction for possession of cocaine with intent to

distribute, conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to

distribute, and aiding and abetting same. He also appeals

his sentence of 235 months imprisonment. We have reviewed

carefully the record in this case, including the transcript

of appellant's trial, the transcript of his disposition

hearing, and appellant's briefs. We find no merit in any of

appellant's claims that the district court erred either

during trial or at appellant's sentencing. Appellant's

objection to the ethnic composition of the jury is foreclosed

by this court's decision in United States v. Pion, 25 F.3d 18
_____________ ____

(1st Cir. 1994). Appellant's claim that he was denied

effective assistance of counsel should be raised in a

collateral proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255. See,
___

e.g., United States v. Jadusingh, 12 F.3d 1162, 1169-70,
___ _____________ _________

(1st Cir. 1994).

Affirmed.
________

-3-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Cuevas, (1st Cir. 1994).

United States v. Cuevas (United States v. Cuevas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Jadusingh
12 F.3d 1162 (First Circuit, 1994)
United States v. Rene M. Pion
25 F.3d 18 (First Circuit, 1994)