United States v. Crystal Davis

369 F. App'x 751
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMarch 2, 2010
Docket09-3459
StatusUnpublished

This text of 369 F. App'x 751 (United States v. Crystal Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Crystal Davis, 369 F. App'x 751 (8th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Crystal Davis pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute 50 grams or more of a mixture or substance containing cocaine base after having been previously convicted of a felony drug offense, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A), 846, and 851. After granting Davis safety-valve relief from the 20-year mandatory minimum sentence, the district court 1 also granted the government’s motion under U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1 for a substantial-assistance departure and sentenced Davis to 81 months in prison and 5 years of supervised release. On appeal, counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing that the sentence is unreasonable. We affirm, *752 and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Davis. After calculating the advisory Guidelines range, the court granted the government’s departure motion and then entertained arguments for a variance and discussed relevant factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) in declining to vary below a sentence of 81 months in prison. See United States v. Berni, 439 F.3d 990, 992-93 (8th Cir.2006) (per curiam) (reviewing sentence involving § 5K1.1 downward departure for reasonableness using abuse-of-discretion standard; sentence was reasonable where court correctly calculated Guidelines range, permissibly applied § 5K1.1 departure, and considered resulting adjusted range and § 3553(a) factors).

Finally, having reviewed the record under Pe nson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we have found no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment, and we grant counsel leave to withdraw.

1

. The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)
United States v. Robert Berni
439 F.3d 990 (Eighth Circuit, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
369 F. App'x 751, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-crystal-davis-ca8-2010.