United States v. Cruz

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Cruz. Read the opinion of the Court — 418 F.3d 481
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 12, 2006·No. 05-40262·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 12, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-40262 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ISRAEL CRUZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:04-CR-561-3 --------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Counsel appointed to represent Israel Cruz has requested

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Cruz was informed of counsel’s

motion but has not filed a response. Our independent review of

the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for

appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and

the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Cruz, (5th Cir. 2006).

United States v. Cruz (United States v. Cruz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)