United States v. Cruel

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Cruel

562 F. App'x 165

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 27, 2014

DocketNo. 13-7767

StatusPublished

This text of 562 F. App'x 165 (United States v. Cruel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Cruel, 562 F. App'x 165 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

[166]*166Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Yueseyuan Cruel appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Cruel, No. 6:08-cr-0079.7-HFF-l, 2013 WL 5522885 (D.S.C. Oct. 4, 2013). We deny Cruel’s motion for injunctive relief and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[166]*166Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Yueseyuan Cruel appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Cruel, No. 6:08-cr-0079.7-HFF-l, 2013 WL 5522885 (D.S.C. Oct. 4, 2013). We deny Cruel’s motion for injunctive relief and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

562 F. App'x 165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cruel-ca4-2014.