United States v. Crucible Steel Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

United States v. Crucible Steel Co.

147 F. 537, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4896

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided June 20, 1906·No. No. 4,150·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

I cannot see that the additional evidence as to trade-designation differentiates this case from that which was before the Court of Appeals. That court disposed of the questions presented upon the theory that. Congress used the terms it employed with the meaning which has been theretofore given therii by the customs authorities under earlier acts. There is nothing in this record to induce a contrary conclusion.

The decision of the Board of General Appraisers is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

I cannot see that the additional evidence as to trade-designation differentiates this case from that which was before the Court of Appeals. That court disposed of the questions presented upon the theory that. Congress used the terms it employed with the meaning which has been theretofore given therii by the customs authorities under earlier acts. There is nothing in this record to induce a contrary conclusion.

The decision of the Board of General Appraisers is affirmed.

United States v. Crucible Steel Co., 147 F. 537, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4896 (circtsdny 1906).

Pincite

147 F. 537 (United States v. Crucible Steel Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related