United States v. Crowley
This text of 7 M.J. 336 (United States v. Crowley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Opinion of the Court
This Court has granted review in the present case on the following assignment of error:
WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE’S INQUIRY INTO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE PRETRIAL AGREEMENT WAS INSUFFICIENT TO COMPLY WITH THIS COURT’S MANDATE.
Review of the record of trial indicates that the military judge only substantially complied with the requirements denominated in United States v. Green, 1 M.J. 453 (C.M.A.1976), for accepting a valid guilty plea. Such a level of compliance was clearly rejected in United States v. King, 3 M.J. 458, 459 (C.M.A.1977). Yet, the appellant’s plea was accepted at a time in between these two decisions. Some confusion may have existed during this interim period.1 Accordingly, this conviction shall not be reversed and the guilty plea invalidated on the showing of mere substantial compliance with our decision in United States v. Green, supra, since the guilty plea was accepted prior to the decision date in United States v. King, supra.
The decision of the United States Army Court of Military Review is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 M.J. 336, 1979 CMA LEXIS 9327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-crowley-cma-1979.