United States v. Cross
This text of 528 F. App'x 379 (United States v. Cross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
William Terrence Cross appeals the district court’s margin order denying his motion to correct a clerical error. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Cross, No. 2:03-cr-00010-RBS-l (E.D.Va. Sept. 27, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[380]*380fore this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
528 F. App'x 379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cross-ca4-2013.