United States v. Crosland

20 F. App'x 4
CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedAugust 6, 2001
DocketNo. 00-3077
StatusPublished

This text of 20 F. App'x 4 (United States v. Crosland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Crosland, 20 F. App'x 4 (D.D.C. 2001).

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See Fed. R.App. P. 36; D.C.Cir. Rule 36(b). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that appellant’s conviction and sentence be affirmed. Appellant pled guilty to distributing over 50 grams of cocaine base, the statutory requirement for conviction under 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(l)(A)(ni). Moreover, appellant’s sentence did not exceed the statutory maximum for the offense to which he pled guilty, nor does it exceed the statutory maximum for the offense to which appellant claims he pled guilty. See United States v. Fields, 251 F.3d 1041 (D.C.Cir.2001) (modifying on rehearing, United States v. Fields, 242 F.3d 393 (D.C.Cir.2001)); In re Sealed Case, 246 F.3d 696, 698 (D.C.Cir.2001).

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re: Sealed Case
246 F.3d 696 (D.C. Circuit, 2001)
United States v. Fields
242 F.3d 393 (D.C. Circuit, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 F. App'x 4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-crosland-dcd-2001.