Home/Fourth Circuit/United States v. Crook

United States v. Crook

396 F. App'x 969
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 4, 2010·No. No. 10-6391·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Samuel Paul Crook appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for ap[970]*970pointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Crook, No. 3:04-cr-00059-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 25, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Crook, 396 F. App'x 969 (4th Cir. 2010).

396 F. App'x 969 (United States v. Crook) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.