United States v. Crockett

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Crockett

91 F. App'x 285

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 31, 2004·No. No. 03-7882·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Dale Crockett appeals the district court’s order denying his request to modify the conditions of his supervised release by delaying his restitution payments until his supervised release period commences. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, [286] we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Crockett, No. CR-98-798 (D.S.C. Nov. 14, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Timothy Dale Crockett appeals the district court’s order denying his request to modify the conditions of his supervised release by delaying his restitution payments until his supervised release period commences. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, [286] we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Crockett, No. CR-98-798 (D.S.C. Nov. 14, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. Crockett, 91 F. App'x 285 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

91 F. App'x 285 (United States v. Crockett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related