United States v. Crittenden

Supreme Court of Arkansas

United States v. Crittenden

25 F. Cas. 694

DecidedOctober 15, 1828

StatusPublished

This text of 25 F. Cas. 694 (United States v. Crittenden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Crittenden, 25 F. Cas. 694 (Ark. 1828).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OP

THE COURT.

The defendant moved the court to quash the indictment, because the time therein stated was in the alternative “on or about,” and because the indictment does not conclude “against the peace and dignity of the United States;” and the parties being heard, and full consideration thereof had, it is the opinion of the court that for either of the objections the indictment should be quashed.

Indictment quashed, and defendant discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OP

THE COURT.

The defendant moved the court to quash the indictment, because the time therein stated was in the alternative “on or about,” and because the indictment does not conclude “against the peace and dignity of the United States;” and the parties being heard, and full consideration thereof had, it is the opinion of the court that for either of the objections the indictment should be quashed.

Indictment quashed, and defendant discharged.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 F. Cas. 694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-crittenden-ark-1828.