United States v. Crittenden

Supreme Court of Arkansas

United States v. Crittenden

25 F. Cas. 694

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided October 15, 1828·Published

Opinion

OPINION OP

THE COURT.

The defendant moved the court to quash the indictment, because the time therein stated was in the alternative “on or about,” and because the indictment does not conclude “against the peace and dignity of the United States;” and the parties being heard, and full consideration thereof had, it is the opinion of the court that for either of the objections the indictment should be quashed.

Indictment quashed, and defendant discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OP

THE COURT.

The defendant moved the court to quash the indictment, because the time therein stated was in the alternative “on or about,” and because the indictment does not conclude “against the peace and dignity of the United States;” and the parties being heard, and full consideration thereof had, it is the opinion of the court that for either of the objections the indictment should be quashed.

Indictment quashed, and defendant discharged.

United States v. Crittenden, 25 F. Cas. 694 (Ark. 1828).

Pincite

25 F. Cas. 694 (United States v. Crittenden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.