United States v. Cristomo Santana-Rojas

599 F. App'x 562
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 16, 2015
Docket14-40531
StatusUnpublished

This text of 599 F. App'x 562 (United States v. Cristomo Santana-Rojas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Cristomo Santana-Rojas, 599 F. App'x 562 (5th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Cristomo Santana-Rojas has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Santana-Rojas has not filed a response.

The record reflects that Santana-Rojas wishes to appeal his sentence only. See United States v. Garcia, 483 F.3d 289, 291 (5th Cir.2007). Santana has completed the confinement portion of his sentence, however, and he has been removed from the United States and may not return. Therefore, the appeal is moot. See United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis, 483 F.3d 381, 382-83 (5th Cir.2007).

Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED AS MOOT.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R, 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Garcia
483 F.3d 289 (Fifth Circuit, 2007)
United States v. Rosenbaum-Alanis
483 F.3d 381 (Fifth Circuit, 2007)
Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
599 F. App'x 562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cristomo-santana-rojas-ca5-2015.