United States v. Cristobal Meza, III

Fifth Circuit

United States v. Cristobal Meza, III

555 F. App'x 455

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Cristobal Meza, III. Read the opinion of the Court — 701 F.3d 411 →

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 21, 2014·No. 13-10302·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Cristobal Meza, III, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Meza has filed a response with an incorporated motion to dismiss the appeal. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Meza’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no non-frivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Additionally, Meza’s pro se motion to dismiss the appeal is DENIED as moot.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Cristobal Meza, III, has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Meza has filed a response with an incorporated motion to dismiss the appeal. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Meza’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no non-frivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Additionally, Meza’s pro se motion to dismiss the appeal is DENIED as moot.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

United States v. Cristobal Meza, III, 555 F. App'x 455 (5th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

555 F. App'x 455 (United States v. Cristobal Meza, III) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related