United States v. Crepeau

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Crepeau

267 F. App'x 224

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 23, 2008·No. No. 07-4817·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Patricia Crepeau appeals the district court’s order affirming the magistrate judge’s dismissal of her pending criminal charge with prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Crepeau, No. 1:07-cr-00242-LMB, 2007 [225]*225WL 2301541 (E.D.Va. Aug. 7, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Patricia Crepeau appeals the district court’s order affirming the magistrate judge’s dismissal of her pending criminal charge with prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Crepeau, No. 1:07-cr-00242-LMB, 2007 [225]*225WL 2301541 (E.D.Va. Aug. 7, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Crepeau, 267 F. App'x 224 (4th Cir. 2008).

Pincite

267 F. App'x 224 (United States v. Crepeau) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.