United States v. Crenshaw

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 12, 1998·No. 97-10692·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-10692 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANTHONY CRENSHAW, also known as Ant,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:96-CR-128-2-Y - - - - - - - - - - June 3, 1998 Before DUHE’, DeMOSS and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court appointed counsel for Anthony Crenshaw has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Crenshaw, (5th Cir. 1998).

United States v. Crenshaw (United States v. Crenshaw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)