United States v. Crawford
276 F. App'x 653
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Crawford. Read the opinion of the Court — 520 F.3d 1072 →
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Paul Crawford appeals the sentence imposed upon revocation of his supervised release. He contends that the district court’s judicial fact findings in support of the revocation sentence violated the Sixth Amendment. As Crawford acknowledges, this contention is foreclosed by United States v. Huerta-Pimental, 445 F.3d 1220 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 127 S.Ct. 545, 166 L.Ed.2d 403 (2006).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Crawford, 276 F. App'x 653 (9th Cir. 2008).
276 F. App'x 653 (United States v. Crawford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Lazaro Huerta-Pimental, AKA Jose Huerta
445 F.3d 1220 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)