United States v. Crawford

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 14, 1999·No. 99-6352·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6352

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

VERN ODELL CRAWFORD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CR-95-70108, CA-99-61-7)

Submitted: July 8, 1999 Decided: July 14, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vern Odell Crawford, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assis- tant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Vern Odell Crawford seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opin-

ion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a cer-

tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See United States v. Crawford, Nos. CR-95-

70108; CA-99-61-7 (W.D. Va. Jan. 29, 1999). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Crawford, (4th Cir. 1999).

United States v. Crawford (United States v. Crawford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related