United States v. Crane

Opinion

[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 01-1431

UNITED STATES,

Appellee,

v.

SUSAN S. CRANE,

Defendant, Appellant.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE

[Hon. Gene Carter, U.S. District Judge]

Before

Torruella, Selya and Lynch, Circuit Judges.

Susan S. Crane on brief pro se. Paula D. Silsby, United States Attorney, and Margaret D. McGaughey, Appellate Chief, on brief for appellee. December 27, 2001

Per Curiam. Pro se defendant Susan Crane appeals

a district court judgment that revoked her supervised

release and sentenced her to an additional term of

imprisonment. Having thoroughly reviewed the record and the

parties' briefs on appeal, we conclude that the district

court did not clearly err in finding that Crane violated the

three conditions of her supervised release. Further, the

court did not abuse its discretion by revoking Crane's

supervised release term and imposing another term of

imprisonment. The arguments that Crane makes to the

contrary are either waived because she did not raise them

below or patently meritless. See, e.g., United States v.

Maxwell, 254 F.3d 21, 25-30 (1 st Cir. 2001). Accordingly,

the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See Local

Rule 27(c).

-2-