United States v. Craig Phillip Coleman
This text of 453 F.2d 1374 (United States v. Craig Phillip Coleman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
453 F.2d 1374
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Craig Phillip COLEMAN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 71-2779.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Feb. 15, 1972.
Gerard J. Glass (argued), Michael H. Weiss, of Hansen, Jaffe & Weiss, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellant.
John F. Cooney, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), James L. Browning, Jr., U. S. Atty., F. Steele Langford, Chief, Criminal Division, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge, MADDEN,* Judge of the United States Court of Claims, and TRASK, Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of conviction in this selective service case is affirmed.
At issue is the failure to exhaust an administrative remedy: that is the taking of an appeal on the classification.
The tests of Lockhart [Lockhart v. United States, 420 F.2d 1143 (9th Cir. 1969)] require affirmance. We cannot find this case within the exception of Donato v. United States, 302 F.2d 468 (9th Cir. 1962).
J. Warren Madden, Senior Judge of the United States Court of Claims, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
453 F.2d 1374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-craig-phillip-coleman-ca9-1972.