United States v. Craig Michael Coscarelli, Also Known as John Coscarelli

111 F.3d 376, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 8080, 1997 WL 186591

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 2, 1997·No. 96-20264·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

(Opinion February 3, 1997, 5 Cir., 1997, 105 F.3d 984)

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and KING, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHÉ, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A majority of judges in active service having determined, on the Court’s own motion, to rehear this case en bane,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc without argument. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(Opinion February 3, 1997, 5 Cir., 1997, 105 F.3d 984)

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and KING, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHÉ, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A majority of judges in active service having determined, on the Court’s own motion, to rehear this case en bane,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc without argument. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

United States v. Craig Michael Coscarelli, Also Known as John Coscarelli, 111 F.3d 376, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 8080, 1997 WL 186591 (5th Cir. 1997).

Pincite

111 F.3d 376 (United States v. Craig Michael Coscarelli, Also Known as John Coscarelli) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

United States v. George L.J. Wilson

249 F.3d 366 (Fifth Circuit, 2001)

United States v. Brown

186 F.3d 661 (Fifth Circuit, 1999)

United States v. Hamilton

Fifth Circuit, 1999

Opinion

Related