United States v. Craig Allen Ladwig

435 F.3d 1147, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 2013, 2006 WL 211729
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Craig Allen Ladwig. Read the opinion of the Court — 432 F.3d 1001
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 27, 2006·No. 04-30393·Published

Opinion

ORDER

In our opinion of December 27, 2005, we retained jurisdiction and directed the parties to provide supplemental briefing on whether either wished to pursue a limited remand under United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). Because both parties have responded that they do not seek an Ameline remand, and other sentencing issues were resolved in our prior opinion, we now AFFIRM Lad-wig’s sentence, and direct the Clerk to issue the mandate after the time for filing a Petition for Rehearing or Petition for Rehearing En Banc has expired.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Craig Allen Ladwig, 435 F.3d 1147, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 2013, 2006 WL 211729 (9th Cir. 2006).

435 F.3d 1147 (United States v. Craig Allen Ladwig) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Alfred Arnold Ameline
409 F.3d 1073 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)