United States v. Cox

55 F. App'x 722
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 23, 2003
DocketNo. 02-3236
StatusPublished

This text of 55 F. App'x 722 (United States v. Cox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Cox, 55 F. App'x 722 (6th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

ORDER

Cedric Bernard Cox appeals the sentence imposed upon his convictions. The parties have expressly waived oral argument, and upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).

Cox was indicted by a grand jury on one count of conspiracy to utter and possess counterfeit securities, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and twenty-six counts of uttering and possessing counterfeit securities, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 513(a). He pleaded guilty to all twenty-seven counts on June 28, 2001, pursuant to a written plea agreement. On November 14, 2001, the district court sentenced Cox to 30 months in prison, a $2,700 special assessment, and $191,632.85 in restitution. The district court also ordered Cox to make restitution immediately in full, with any balance remaining at the time of his release to be paid according to a “schedule of payments approved by the probation officer.”

The sentence is affirmed except the portion of the sentence respecting restitution is reversed and remanded to the District Court for reconsideration in light of the recent case of United States v. Davis, 306 F.3d 398, 425-26 (6th Cir.2002) (delegating authority to set schedule of restitution payments constitutes plain error).

Accordingly, it is so ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. David Devon Davis
306 F.3d 398 (Sixth Circuit, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 F. App'x 722, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cox-ca6-2003.