United States v. Cox

76 M.J. 64, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 27
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedJanuary 17, 2017
DocketNo. 16-0635/AR
StatusPublished

This text of 76 M.J. 64 (United States v. Cox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Cox, 76 M.J. 64, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 27 (Ark. 2017).

Opinion

CCA 20130923. On further consideration of the granted issues, 75 M.J.457 (C.A.A.F. 2016), the facts that the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals issued its judgment in Appellant’s case on April 29, 2016, and Appellate Military Judges Paulette V. Burton and James W. Herring were appointed by the President to the United States Court of Military Commission Review on May 25, 2016, and in light of United States v. Dalmazzi, 76 M.J. 1 (C.A.A.F. 2016), it is ordered that the order issued October 3, 2016, granting review is hereby vacated, and that Appellant’s petition for grant of review is hereby denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Dalmazzi
76 M.J. 1 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 M.J. 64, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cox-armfor-2017.