United States v. Cousins

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Cousins

580 F. App'x 226

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedAugust 1, 2014

DocketNo. 14-6716

StatusPublished

This text of 580 F. App'x 226 (United States v. Cousins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Cousins, 580 F. App'x 226 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Eugene Ross Cousins appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion to reopen, denying appointment of counsel and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Cousins, No. 5:06-cr-00008-GEC-RSB (WD.Va., Apr. 14, 2004; Apr. 28, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Eugene Ross Cousins appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion to reopen, denying appointment of counsel and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Cousins, No. 5:06-cr-00008-GEC-RSB (WD.Va., Apr. 14, 2004; Apr. 28, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

580 F. App'x 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-cousins-ca4-2014.