United States v. Courtright

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Courtright

446 F. App'x 235

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided November 8, 2011·No. No. 10-14878·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Ray C. Lopez, appointed counsel for Billy Jack Courtright, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and [236] Courtright’s conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Ray C. Lopez, appointed counsel for Billy Jack Courtright, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and [236] Courtright’s conviction and sentence is AFFIRMED.

United States v. Courtright, 446 F. App'x 235 (11th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

446 F. App'x 235 (United States v. Courtright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related