United States v. Courtney Smith
This text of 814 F.2d 1086 (United States v. Courtney Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
60 A.F.T.R.2d 87-5741, 87-2 USTC P 9637
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Courtney SMITH, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 86-4478.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
April 21, 1987.
Rehearing Denied May 14, 1987.
J. Ransdell Keene, Evans, Feist, Keene & Mills, Taylor W. O'Hearn, Shreveport, La., for defendant-appellant.
Mary Frances Clark, Atty., Michael L. Paup, Chief, Roger M. Olsen, Asst. Atty. Gen., Richard Farber, Atty., Appellate Section, Tax. Div., U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., Joseph S. Cage, Jr., U.S. Atty., John R. Halliburton, Asst. U.S. Atty., Shreveport, La., Alice J. Davis, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana; Tom Stagg, Judge.
Before THORNBERRY, GEE, and JONES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
We affirm on the basis of the district court opinion in United States v. Smith, 657 F.Supp. 646 (W.D.La.1986).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
814 F.2d 1086, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-courtney-smith-ca5-1987.