United States v. Coupar

140 F. App'x 665
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Coupar. Read the opinion of the Court — 116 F. App'x 837
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 28, 2005·No. No. 03-50074; D.C. No. CR-99-00128-SVW·Published

Opinion

ORDER

In a prior disposition we affirmed the conviction and sentence of defendant-appellant Douglas Arthur Coupar (“Coupar”). Coupar then filed and the Supreme Court granted his petition for writ of certiorari, vacated our judgment, and re-? manded the case for further consideration in light of United States v. Booker, — U.S. —, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005).

Because we cannot determine whether the district court would have imposed a materially different sentence under the now discretionary federal sentencing guidelines, we remand to the district court for the limited purpose of reconsideration of Coupar’s sentence in light of United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073, 1074 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). Coupar’s conviction is affirmed in all other respects for the reasons stated in our prior November 8, 2005, disposition.

REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Coupar, 140 F. App'x 665 (9th Cir. 2005).

140 F. App'x 665 (United States v. Coupar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Booker
543 U.S. 220 (Supreme Court, 2004)
United States v. Alfred Arnold Ameline
409 F.3d 1073 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)